View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:00 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,499
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade View Post
Your confusing the the thrust of the thread.

Reset.

- The washington post pointed out how the media was treating Obama very delicately.

- I pointed out how my criticisms of Obama invariable result in charges of racism.

- The issue is whether critics of Obama will be stifled, or attempt to be stifled, by the well known "race card" tactic.

Comment on the issue raised, or shut up.
Duh summed it up nicely in that thread. The article had nothing to do with race, never even *mentioned* race. So your thread title is what injected race into the debate.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote