USGrant, you seem really concerned that someone would suggest that the Bible might not be the literal word of God.

But tell me. Would your faith in God be destroyed if it was proven that certain parts of it (like, say, the Genesis story) had to be metaphorical?

If so, what does that say about the strength of your faith?

If not, what are you worried about?

Further, consider these possibilities:

What if it wasn't metaphorical, but general? As in "creating the birds of the air and the fish of the sea" didn't mean creating them in their modern forms, but in the form of their evolutionary precursors?

What if it wasn't metaphorical, but a "day" back then wasn't the same as a day now (especially because day and night weren't created until midway through the process)? Could not a day back then have lasted the equivalent of a billion years today?

If your answer to any of that is "no", does that not arbitrarily limit the God you claim is omnipotent?

There are plenty of literal readings of the Bible that yield results compatible with science and evolution. You've just chosen the narrowest such interpretation. Which makes no particular sense as a matter of either logic or faith.

__________________
Man up.