Quote:
Originally Posted by bugalugs
Your comprehension skills leave much to be desired.
He said he was wrong.
DID YOU GET THAT?
"...I have publicly withdrawn this point of my critique."
He was "disavowing himself of all his findings".
2. Science rejects the letter. And the author later publicly withdraws his criticism.
3. The author later admits that the only one, single non-consensus view he really found was not actually a peer-reviewed paper - but an editorial published by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
And this, you claim "proves your entire point" which was:
Amazing!
|
every link you provide me gives me more information which proves my point. I think you are selectively choosing verbage which supports your theory, and ignoring that which does not. This is from the link you provided:
Whatever nuance you may now have uncovered to criticise this list, the basic fact remains as this reveals: When Gore suggests there is absolutely no scientific debate on man-made global warming he is not telling the truth.
— Andrew Bolt to Media Watch, 27th October, 2006