Quote:
Originally Posted by DuH2
IOW Yes...Yes they would be there as they where there prior to the invasion......
One of the worst miscarriages of the media is failing to debunk the claim Democrats make that al Qaeda was not in Iraq prior to the invasion..when they all know (*)(*)(*)(*) well it was!
|
Your own quote:
Quote:
|
in an area of northeastern Iraq not under Iraqi government control
|
So there was a camp under the protection of the US no fly zones and out of the control of Saddam. So let me get this strait, there is no link to this camp and Saddam, but it justifies the attack to remove Saddam from power.
And you GULP the cool aid. President Bush intentionally did not attack this camp just so lemmings like yourself could make the claim that Al Qaida is in Iraq even if they had no links to Saddam.
President Bush stopped attacking known terrorists, resulting in the deaths of many US soldiers in a resistance led by Zarqawi, just so you could make this ridiculous claim.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/
Quote:
The Pentagon drew up still another attack plan, and for the third time, the National Security Council killed it.
Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam.
|