View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:58 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 15,410
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 103,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremiah L. View Post
The question is, is it the government's RIGHT to set certain rules like that? And besides that, the Rights of a Child document is not just setting rules against abuse and neglect, which should definitely be punished. But it's giving government power to define and decide when it can step in and take custody of a child, which it should not have. In extreme cases, yes, the government should take custody of a child who is being abused or neglected. But just letting it decide to do it whenever parents are "unfit," is ridiculous.
So are the individual parents doing the abuse and neglect the ones to decide?
It makes more sense to have a societal decision. That would mean government.

Should individuals have the right to determine when a killing is a murder or when fighting becomes assault?
We need societal definitions of these things.
__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside
Reply With Quote