What do the libs think of this?
found this gem in a liberal blog spot:
"Bernie, according to the mainstream DC gossip column, was writing a book on the sexual hypocrisy of the right, so he downloaded some pictures and e-mailed them to some right wingers he didn't like, hoping he could entrap them. "One of them," says XXXXXXXX, "skeeved that someone was sending him sick child porn over the internet, reported it (as is required by law) to the police."
What's sad is that Bernie might have written his book in peace if he hadn't fallen prey to the song of his lesser angel who tempted him with a gotcha on his enemies.
A solution, however, must found for this conundrum for reporters- and it's legislative:
As Debbie Nathan writes in Counterpunch, "Journalists need some kind of system or First Amendment permit to allow them to do their reporting. Otherwise, the public will remain ignorant about what’s really going on with child pornography. And media people trying to find out will risk indictment, or worse."
How funny. Now we need to allow reporters to access kiddie porn so that the can report on perverts looking at kiddie porn? Or, we could let all the pervs become reporters, and then it will be perfectly legal!
__________________
"We should Invade Their Countries, Kill Their Leaders, and Convert Them to Christianity." Ann Coulter
Thank You, and God Bless America!
Obsama Bin Laden For President? Are you kidding?
|