View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2008, 08:16 AM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,060
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 160,642
Default

You shouldn't have tried to bite off so much with one post.

Take "poor" for instance. If you go strictly by the census and their definition of the poverty level, you fail to take into account cost of living. Cost of living can be somewhat correlated with median income. Simply using the number of people with incomes below the poverty level can be quite misleading. You can imagine that in a high cost of living area, the poverty level should be much higher. You'd also have to correlate the numbers of illegals and other immigrants who don't speak English. There are many things that contribute to the poverty level. Standards of living might be a better criteria to use in making your case.
__________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote