View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2008, 07:27 PM
commonsense's Avatar
commonsense commonsense is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,204
usa us texas
commonsense is a splendid one to beholdcommonsense is a splendid one to beholdcommonsense is a splendid one to beholdcommonsense is a splendid one to beholdcommonsense is a splendid one to beholdcommonsense is a splendid one to beholdcommonsense is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 6,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voltaire View Post
No, it's not that, but I have heard numerous arguments for both sides, my purpose on this board is to stir thought, not change opinion.

Your information sounds accurate enough.
While I will agree with you, the founders did an excellent job leaving their beliefs by the wayside; it is also important to know early colonial - especially religious colonial - governments did not harbor the kind, generous leadership made out in many history books. This, the behavior of Puritans, was one of the motivating factors for the founders to drop clauses of religious intent.

From your link:
"...Adams opined that if they were not restrained by legal measures, Puritans -- the fundamentalists of their day -- would "whip and crop, and pillory and roast." "

(lol...I think we've derailed the thread just a bit)
__________________
"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried" Churchill

Last edited by commonsense; 03-09-2008 at 07:29 PM.
Reply With Quote