Quote:
Originally Posted by frodly
Very nice, I am not attacking his source, only pointing out that he entered a thread with an Iranian living in Iran. Made definitive statements, and the Iranian guy said they weren't true! He then started this thread!
I am a history major, so sourcing is important to me. The Iranian guy is a primary source, his statements are likely biased in some way, as are everyones. But he is still a primary source!
|
Iranian guy denied they were true- and he was Obviously Lying.
Denied Stonings, etc.
Refused to debate my points one by one.
His posts completely fraudulent.
There are many more sources to prove anything I said in that thread.
You didn't like my (obviously true) word against his in that thread- so I post an Iranian expat Expert on the subject in the WSJ, and you deny that too a "just an artice"!
LOL. Catch 22 and 23.
You don't accept widely known facts about Iran I posted in my own words
But You accept he's unwilling to debate anything; just says Idiotically/generally about my whole list (!) "untrue".
Then you don't accept an Iranian expert in the WSJ.
Sa Habla Internet?
Do you think YOU might spend 30 seconds checking these facts or just be numbingly obtuse and accept his word over mine because you like 3rd world posters?
UNbelievably Lazy and biased.