Only because it just so happens that at this stage it's legal for them to do so.

I suppose that if women got to legally choose whether or not to kill their babies after they were born (because it's very hard work and they might find it easier to get rid of them) - say, up until they are one year old - and that was legislation, that you would agree with that too?

Also, I've been meaning to ask. Since you have finally admitted that your imaginary differences between `human' and `human being' and `live and not alive' and `dependent but not dependant' are actually because that's what the law says - does that mean that if the law changed then you would change your mind, too?

If the law all of a sudden said that a foetus had rights prior to birth would you just as quickly decide that everything you've been claiming has been bogus?

Or do you actually have some of your own ideas?

__________________
We've got rules and maps and guns in our backs, but we still can't just behave ourselves. Even if to save our own lives, we are a brutal kind. The Shins