View Single Post
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 04:21 PM
i.beletesri's Avatar
i.beletesri i.beletesri is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,228
i.beletesri is a splendid one to beholdi.beletesri is a splendid one to beholdi.beletesri is a splendid one to beholdi.beletesri is a splendid one to beholdi.beletesri is a splendid one to beholdi.beletesri is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 11,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klipkap View Post
So tell me - is there agreement by the democratic forces on this forum as to what is more important?:

1) Is it what the non-voting authors on UNSC 242 said they meant when they drafted the resolutions? ...
"Non-voting authors"?
What?
I see you tried that Lie on the bottom page one; #8.

The Authors mentioned on the first page of this string WERE all voting members- or delegates within.

Lord Caradon, main author, was the British ambassador to the UN. Voted!
Arthur Goldberg, Head of the US delegation. Voted!

They certainly knew what it meant and are quoted.

Kuznetsov, (Head of the Soviet delegation) who VOTED against it BECAUSE he also knew what it meant.

How do you explain that? Arabs Soviet ally and supplier votes Against resolution that returns "all" Arab Land?

I see throughout this string your incredible and stupefying denial.

Last edited by i.beletesri; 03-17-2008 at 04:40 PM.
Reply With Quote