Quote:
Originally Posted by Publius Infinitum
So SPECIFICALLY, how has the principle on which the 2nd Amendment rests, changed?
Now if you need to look up "specific" before you answer, please do. Don't waste this forums time with your feelings, I want to know the SPECIFIC changes that have invalidated the principles which provided protections on the means of government power to disarm the citizenry.
Your failure to provide such specifics will be your default concession...
|
Militia: An army composed of ordinary citizens rather than professional soldiers.
Hmmm, well recently there haven't been many rebellions that are being put down or a revolutionary war taking place on our soil. I see no need for an army composed of ordinary citizens, for there is no army or opposing force that a militia would fight. An army is not necessary. I truly hope that with that I didn't waste your time or anybody else on this forum's time
. The "right to bear arms" is being taken out of context, as there are not many "well regulated militias" but there are active firearm users who abuse this amendment.