Originally Posted by Qwerty

IMO, Intelligent Design seems a bit vague in it's "theory". The evidence they provide is evidence to disprove other theories. While evolutionist are trying to piece all the pieces together and determine all the evolutionary paths, I've yet to see any big works put forward by IDers to establish what species were designed, and what ones were variations of natural selection.

I hear some say all dogs are from the same species. They'll accept that natural selection can change them from breed to breed. but I've never seen any IDer show a theory to what the original Dog looked like. What was the Dogs first design from the "designer". Maybe it's been done for dogs and I just haven't seen it, but you got to start working on ALL species.

Honestly, if you want your hypothesis taken seriously, you got to do some leg work. Half (*) jobs are unacceptable.

ID should not be taught in school, it's a mockery of Science.