View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 02:44 PM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 14,588
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 141,886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
So? A right-wing rag is run by a cultist, and your question is "so?"

that's priceless.
What's priceless is your double standard. As demonstrated below. So apparently Washington Times writers are guilty by association. Funny, I read somewhere on this board where that is a fallacy. The Times offsets the numerous left wing rags like the NY Times, Newsweek, SF Chronicle, LA Times, etc.

They also own the UPI. Where is your complaint about them? This doesn't address whether he is involved in writing the news.

Quote:
By the way, Roger Baldwin has been dead for nearly 30 years; and the ACLU champions libertarian ideals of individual rights...

It's not the media arm of a global cult.
It was founded by a Commie. Just like your concern of the Times being founded by Moon.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote