View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:19 PM
nerv14 nerv14 is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 66
usa us new jersey
nerv14 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danik View Post
This is doubtful unless this country as a whole gets really smart about how it chooses to live. So many people are obese that it is disgusting and heart disease and diabetes is developing at a rapid pace due to so many unhealthy lifestyles. It doesn't even begin to consider the number of preventative medicine that people "require" because they refuse to eat better, exercise, or both. It might drop costs slightly due to a larger pool of people, but one would be naive to think that with the rising costs of health care this is an affordable plan. I'm sorry if I don't understand why I should be subsidizing pigs, drunks, and smokers.

The main problem I see is that it supposedly would cut costs through preventative care, however, it also removes the incentive for people to perform basic, easy tasks to stay healthy. Too many people want a magic pill for everything, and too many people want everything paid for them.
In Europe and Canada universal healthcare is very popular and even though Europeans smoke alot they still don't have a problem with unbearable costs from lunge cancer. Even though America is different, I haven't heard any real evidence that it will be too much different than Europe. Even though we spend more on education and our schooling is worse, I still think it will work for healthcare.

I understand what you are saying about people not taking as good of care of themselves but Canadians are still healthier even with universal healthcare. Anyway, I don't think people will change their lifestyle too much if medicine is free.

Its a risk but i think it is worth it.
Reply With Quote