Thread: Your Stupidity
View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:34 PM
Raharu Haruha's Avatar
Raharu Haruha Raharu Haruha is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,276
Raharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 13,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies View Post
The science for creating ethanol has been around since the 1920's.

Without subsidies, it is not profitable. With grain prices rising it becomes even less profitable. It is illogical to use so much energy to create energy. It is scientifically inefficient to burn so much fuel, tilling, planting, fertilizing, harvesting, hauling, and processing into fuel just to create more fuel. As this demand for corn causes the price of corn to rise, the price of other foods rises due to more land being allocated for corn. With every increase of ethanol use, these prices rise; making ethanol even more inefficient and unprofitable and requiring more of our tax dollars. We're in a hole already, stop digging.

If you want to read the truth about ethanol or current energy.... I suggest this journalist:
http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wall...ry/504307.html
http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wall...ry/541726.html
http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wall...ry/541726.html
http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wallace/

and just for the fun of it: http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wall...ry/433165.html
Ed Wallace is cool. ^-^

That isn't a corn grower. That's a fertilizer business that uses up very much energy with their products.

I have a feeling the same rich people are going to be owning these ethanol plants as well as investing in corn farming. Even with subsidies the market is still risky for these plants. Only someone with enough money are building them. Land prices have been steadily rising pushing out the family farmer. Big Oil will likely control every energy source.

Oil supply is high as ever yet we aren't refining it fast enough. Not only do environmentalists not support new refineries, oil companies don't want them either since that would lower their profits.
Your argument is still irrelevant because this thread assumes that either oil prices will rise or that ethanol will some how becomes better. It doesn't matter that it's unethical now, and it doesn't matter that there are subsidies now, what ever. The point of the thread is that IF oil ever became so scares that it passed the point of being efficient, which source of energy would we use? My answer is ethanol, for the reasons listed.
Reply With Quote