Thread: Global Warming
View Single Post
  #396 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008, 01:42 PM
kscott13's Avatar
kscott13 kscott13 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 714
usa us washington
kscott13 is a splendid one to beholdkscott13 is a splendid one to beholdkscott13 is a splendid one to beholdkscott13 is a splendid one to beholdkscott13 is a splendid one to beholdkscott13 is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 2,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugalugs View Post
I really don't understand what your point is.
My point is that Global Warming is a natural phenomenon. Others share in this opinion. This link is interesting.

http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/resear...l/abstract.htm

Quote:
Background: Only 52 Scientists Participated in UN IPCC Summary

The over 400 skeptical scientists featured in this new report outnumber by nearly eight times the number of scientists who participated in the 2007 UN IPCC Summary for Policymakers. The notion of “hundreds” or “thousands” of UN scientists agreeing to a scientific statement does not hold up to scrutiny. Recent research by Australian climate data analyst Dr. John McLean revealed that the IPCC’s peer-review process for the Summary for Policymakers leaves much to be desired.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=636_1198188716

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...8-3c63dc2d02cb

I apologize if I re-state anything in this thread, as it is large and I may have missed things as I read.

Last edited by kscott13; 04-07-2008 at 01:44 PM.
Reply With Quote