I love this begging-the-question line:

When a scientist’s interpretation of data does not match the clear meaning of the text in the Bible, we should never reinterpret the Bible.

Thus, proceeding from the assumption that the Bible is literally true, they go about "proving" that radiocarbon dating is flawed.

Here's some specific rebuttals of the claims in the link:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/c14datc.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-c14.html

__________________
Man up.