Facts do tend to get in the way of the faulty logic and false *theory* used by todays evolutionists. Like the fact that Darwin believed in a Creator, capitol "C". If you would have read the origin of species, you would know this. Even he would disagree with your brand of evolution.
"To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator......... There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone circling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved." (Darwin Origin of species)
Even thought both Hitler and Stalin were heavily motivated by the theory of evolution...
http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
...this is not the argument made to discredit evolution. If this is what you really believe, with all due respect, you are unqualified to comment in this matter.
Actually, the Bible says that the world is round. Science caught up with the Bible about when, oh, the middle ages (wink).
BTW,the theory of evolution can stand or fall on it's own. Your not passing over this inconvenient simple truth would be the intellectually honesty thing to do. Agreed?
Now, since it is fact that we are dealing with, lets start with this.
The notion that natural evolutionary processes can account for the origin of all living species has never been and never will be established as fact. Nor is it "scientific" in any true sense of the word. Science deals with what can be observed and reproduced by experimentation. The origin of life can be neither observed nor reproduces in any laboratory. By definition, then, true science can give us no knowledge whatsoever about about where we came from or how we got here. Belief in evolutionary theory is a matter of sheer faith. And dogmatic belief in any naturalistic theory is no more "scientific" than any other kind of religious faith." (Macarthur)
What say you?
One must make a distinction between macro evolution.
Microevolution- this is when organisms adapt to the changing conditions of the environment. It improves existing genes. It does not create new genes. An example that illustrates this is the classic peppered moth argument. Basically, when the trees are white, there are more white moths, conversely when the trees were turned black by pollution at the turn of the century, more black moths survived simply from being harder to see, not changing into a different moth. The moths are still moths, not a new creature.
Macroevolution-the changes within species that results in a new and separate species. An example of this would be a fish evolving into a bird. This has never been proven or observed in nature.
Micro is witnessed in nature every day. Nobody denies it. Macro has no proof, and has relied on muddying the waters between the two, and a propaganda campaign to hide the truth from the general public.
There has never been observed even a single example of a mutation that has actually improved the genetic code by adding new meaningful information. But because examples such as the wingless beetles and the peppered moths show physical changes in living creatures, they are still repeatedly used by evolutionists to promote the idea that primitive bacteria have changed so much in the distant past that today they have become people.
Read more about this from the links below.
What say you?
Debunking Evolution: problems, errors, and lies exposed, in plain language for non-scientists
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32
Problems for the Theory of Evolution
http://www.christiancourier.com/arti...y_of_evolution
The Scientific Case Against Evolution
http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/locke.html
Why Evolution Is Wrong --Problems For Evolution
http://www.trueauthority.com/cvse/fiftyreasons.htm
Science against Evolution
http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/
http://www.geocities.com/reasonstobe...000/index.html
http://www.christiananswers.net/crea...u-fossils.html
Absolutely no evidence of proof evolution has been proven to be impossible.
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/mutations.html
How did the theory of evolution last so long without any proof? Here's one example of how they keep the truth from you.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...081801680.html
BTW, Ben Stein's new movie "expelled" will show more on this.
That should be enough for now.
Dave