Quote:
|
Do we really know the origin of what we call natural laws? In Darwins days basically everyone still believed in a creator.
|
What does this have to do with...
"It is precisely the other way around, empty emotional propaganda and false claims appear to be the only weapons the other side has to counter the logic and reason of Darwin's theory."
It seems you have highjacked Darwins name to promote a theory which was not even his, using the man's name with "
empty emotional propaganda and false claims". That was my point.
Isaiah 40:22
http://www.answersingenesis.org/us/n...s/0606lead.asp
http://www.biblebb.com/files/MAC/sg1348.htm
Quote:
|
The word "science" originated from the Latin word for knowledge "scientia", basically spoken science is everything that produces knowledge and understanding and therefore the theory of evolution is a science in the true sense of the word because it leads to knowledge and understanding. Many areas of physics, psychology, history, philosophy, and many other areas of science in many cases are no more provable than the theory of evolution because they often deal with things beyond our current reach. It's for example impossible to reproduce or prove the existence of mental illnesses in any scientific way and it is equally impossible to prove or disprove the existence of black holes and many other theories modern physics deals with.
|
We use the word "propaganda" when the theories of science overlook the hard facts of science that contradict those theories, or better, in fact, prove them wrong.
Quote:
|
Human races and diseases? Light skin and hair for example, traits based on mutations, increse the attractiveness for the opposite sex and thus create better chances of reproduction. And many diseases evolve constantly to adapt to medication and the attacks by the immune system. Are those not example of improved genetic code by adding new information through a process of mutation?
|
No. Human races are still human races (same species). Macro evolution has never been proven.
Quote:
|
I'm pretty sure that given some thousand years of isolation the current human races would probably have developed into different species no longer able to produce healthy offspring by crossbreeding.
|
I'm pretty sure the Browns will win the Super Bowl this year. Science?
Quote:
|
I read some of your links and I'm not convinced. A lot of pseudo science and to many Jewish sounding names involved to take it seriously. The world really does not need more Jewish a priori junk science. Darwinism may not be fully probable yet but at least it is a theory based on philosophy conform to the laws of reason and logic
|
After all we talked about, you continue to both attack and defend the same position. We have, though, established that you don't like or trust Jews.
Quote:
creationism on the other hand is based on dogmas and biblical nonsense. Exchanging reason for dogmas is leading backwards. The theory of the flying pasta monster, no less unreasonable than creationism, is at least funny.
Do you honestly believe that there is a big daddy in heaven and whenever he gets bored he creates some new species to see how they fit into the world he created? That when he became bored of the dinosaurs he removed them and tried something new?
|
As I said before, the theory of evolution can stand or fall on it's own. To ignore this simple inconvenient truth would not be the intellectually honest thing to do. I know that's important to you.
"Long before the reader has arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of difficulties will have occurred to him. Some of them are so serious that to this day I can hardly reflect on them without being in some degree staggered" (Darwin, Op. cit., p. 124).
http://www.truthmagazine.com/archive...1/TM021275.htm
Thanks for your reply. Especially to the points made in the links that I provided.
Dave