Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
Facts do tend to get in the way of the faulty logic and false *theory* used by todays evolutionists. Like the fact that Darwin believed in a Creator, capitol "C". If you would have read the origin of species, you would know this. Even he would disagree with your brand of evolution.
|
Meaningless. Science doesn't base itself on what a single person says (unlike Christianity). It is based on repeated, falsifiable experimentations that have the support of the evidence and the consensus of science. Besides, science and the Theory of Evolution have had 150 years to evolve in Darwin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
Even thought both Hitler and Stalin were heavily motivated by the theory of evolution...
|
The very page you quote after this disproves this statement! If Stalin and Hitler where so motivated by evolution, then why do you think its teaching was banned in both Nazi Germany and the USSR?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
Actually, the Bible says that the world is round. Science caught up with the Bible about when, oh, the middle ages (wink).
|
No, the exact quote is the Circle of the Earth. In Hebrew, it uses the word for "Circle",
even though Hebrew has a word for Sphere or Ball. Why would God say Circle if he really meant Sphere? The Bible supports the early mesopotamian cosmology that the Earth is flat and covered by some kind of tent like "Firmament" and that the star and sun hang from it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
What say you?
|
I say "Link?". If this is quote from Darwin, I'd like to remind you that science has had 150 years to advance since he wrote Origin of the Species. People didn't even know about the structure of the atom or radioactivity in his time. Our ability to observe things has greatly expanded.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
[i]One must make a distinction between macro evolution.
|
No one must not. the Theory of Evolution does NOT contain two different types or levels of evolution. Evolution is evolution is evolution. The Mirco/Macro divide was invented by fundamentalists not scientists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
Micro is witnessed in nature every day. Nobody denies it. Macro has no proof, and has relied on muddying the waters between the two, and a propaganda campaign to hide the truth from the general public.
|
So, let me ask you a question: What is the magical barrier stopping minor "micro" changes from leading up to larger "marco" changes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
There has never been observed even a single example of a mutation that has actually improved the genetic code by adding new meaningful information. But because examples such as the wingless beetles and the peppered moths show physical changes in living creatures, they are still repeatedly used by evolutionists to promote the idea that primitive bacteria have changed so much in the distant past that today they have become people.
|
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html#CB100
Covers all the claims you made here and debunks them. Note its the same site you cited earlier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
What say you?
|
I say you should probably read more on Talkorigins rather than quoting PRATT websites.