Not at all and I should have clarified in my first post.

I'm upset that it is shown so much and seems so blatanly one-sided. They don't even discuss the possibility that it could be wrong or that man-made GW doesn't exist.

They show it as if it is the definitive proof and there is no more debate. I stated, "better than showing an inconvenient truth" because in that discussion, there is a debate. In the one where I'm shown IT three times in two years, there is no debate.