It seems to me that the same people who are passionate about the right to bear arms on the basis that government can become tyrannical are also the people who are blindly defensive about U.S. foreign policy. Those who would furiously defend an individual's property rights and privacy are [apparently] unperturbed when the U.S. military interferes in the privacy and internal affairs of other countries. Moreover, these same people- who do not trust government to do almost anything else- become completely blindly passive and trusting with regard to the President and the Pentagon's military assessments and decisions.

I don't get it. Is it just because the government in question is Republican? Is there some disconnect or have I missed a piece in the puzzle.