Quote:
Originally Posted by eleanoraquitaine
It is not bigoted to condemn an evil ideology, its moral clarity. islam was founded by an utterly evil man who wrote totally evil words who evil people have been following for centuries to do evil things. It is simply illogical to suddenly declare this evil, violent ideology peaceful simply because you consider it politically correct, which is what you are really doing.
Its nonsense to suggest we should simply tolerate evil because something else was once evil and now isn't. islamofascism must be defeated, forced to abandon its evil ways in order for it to be compatible with the modern world. This is simple truth that will increasingly be exposed to all as this war of civilization versus islamobarbarism continues to escalate (as they breed and emigrate like cockroaches).
|
So what of Muslims who practice peacefully, and are good people?
They obviously have a different interpretation than what you are purporting, so obviously there is some room for discussion. If it was entirely true in what you were saying, then Muslims would be en masse violent and almost all of them evil. But the fact is, they are not.
You are painting them with a broad brush. And that's because you have a preconceived notion (your signature tells me that) about their religion. It is a backwards religion in many ways but honestly -- which religion isn't? Right now they are the most backward because they live in squalor. They are uneducated, underfed, without jobs, and without futures. Religion is a salvation they will place a lot of hope in, because their immediate life doesn't have the value yours and mine does.
If you replaced all the Muslims in the world with Christians, and that you were switched as well (if you are Christian now, you'd be Muslim and raised as one), then your signature would hold the quotes of the Bible how it is offensive, violent, and preaches evil and violence.
And I'm always entertained by the "Islamo" -
insert adjective words. They are very tired and repetitive, and usually don't have any information whatsoever, but try to push a certain viewpoint on an audience, with minimal understanding and maximum exposure on the negative connotation of the word. Fun word games -- all crafted by speechwriters and focus groups and tireless hours to figure out how to push a message.
Anyway, if you want to defeat "islamofacism" then you should be more open to pushing education, technology, history, science on those people. Not keeping them repressed, as you seem to have no issue with. Just think of all the brilliant minds that were active during the Crusades before the British and French started to break apart all the empires and install selective dictatorships around the globe (where they found oil). You know, the same minds that came up with mathematics we use today, the ones that came up with medicinal achievements, or surgical ones (cataract surgery was a big one at the time, still is). Imagine if we could help those minds come to fruition yet again. That would involve of course, taking away the power the dictatorships have, it would mean a steadily increasing price of oil, and less control on how the oil market would function but hey... then we'd defeat "islamofacism", terrorism, and all the other bad things you think about Islam as a whole. They would be equivalent to Christians, Jews, or anybody else -- with a focus on their future, their money, their jobs, their families.
But mostly, I think people aren't willing to pay that $8.00 a gallon for that benefit. That's why we use words like "islamofacist", just to paint a brush on a people, get what we want, and not really care about the entire picture other than cheap gasoline.