View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 09:33 AM
KidCann117's Avatar
KidCann117 KidCann117 is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 64
usa
KidCann117 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 442
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKentuckian View Post
Freedom of religion does not equate to freedom from religion.

The state cannot promote a particular religion but that in no way implies that every mention of God in public life must be eradicated.

I have no problem with people praying to whoever they want or displaying their faith in public settings, including in schools. If a kid wants to talk about or pray to Jesus, Muhammad, Krishna, Budda, the Devil, or Zeus then that is their right. The same goes for politicians. The Islamics, Athiests, and the Moral majority as well as their offspring just have to deal with it.

These things are not the establishment of religion but rather an acceptance of religion. The two are not the same.
I am fine with "One Nation under God" and "In God We Trust" and I actually apreciate the ambiguity of the God that we mention. It is like the Masonic tenet that you should believe God, but it doesnt matter what God you do believe in. But with the rise of Atheism, its become different...
Besides the Democracy and Theocracy are not synonmous.
__________________
This Machine Kills Fascists!

Resistance to Tyranny is Obedience to God

Remember the Children of Sderot
Reply With Quote