Quote:
|
He condemned them for being hypocrites, not for being "evil."
|
I don't condemn muslims for being "evil" either. I condemn them for following the commands of muhammed to wage eternal jihad to make the world muslim, enslaved by muslims, or dead, not to mention their violence against women, gays, child rape, etc. So, you are agreeing these judgments are valid. Thanks.
Quote:
|
Joining the Nazi party wasn't exactly voluntary. It was either join or be killed. Some joined because they actually believed Hitler, others joined to save their skin. The situation is entirely different and your analogy is unfair.
|
Again, you are agreeing with my points. Just because someone called themself a nazi or had others call themself a nazi doesn't mean they are/were a nazi. If they didn't follow the example and teachings of Hitler, they weren't a nazi. if they fought against the nazis while pretending to be one, they weren't a nazi. The same is true of muslims. If they don't follow the evil example and commands of muhammed and the quran, then they aren't a muslim.
It would be good to give these people their own name, like "good muslims", or "muslims against islam and muhammed" or "reformed muslims" or "neavou muslims formerly known as islamofascists" or something to tell them apart from the normal psychopathic killer muslims.