View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:03 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,519
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade View Post
Yes, and what that something other is control over other people's lives - scratch a lib and find a control freak.
Conservatives are control freaks in their own ways. Or rather, I should say "social conservatives."

Quote:
And it's conservatives who give more money to charity, not liberals.
First, note that the article itself points out that the difference is in how people view government's role, not in relative generosity. Conservatives will oppose social programs while giving slightly more to charity; liberals will donate less money to charity but support social programs that achieve as much or more.

Second, Stossel's experiment was bogus, largely because the Salvation Army is a religious organization, and a rather conservative one at that. It's no surprise that a conservative, religious population is more willing to donate to such a group than a liberal, nonreligious population that also happens to have lots of members of a group (homosexuals) that the Salvation Army considers immoral (unless they are celibate).
__________________
Man up.

Last edited by raytri; 04-17-2008 at 01:03 PM.
Reply With Quote