View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:08 PM
TheChief's Avatar
TheChief TheChief is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia, Perth
Posts: 747
usa
TheChief has a spectacular aura aboutTheChief has a spectacular aura aboutTheChief has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 2,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore View Post
They do disarm law-abiding people. Its not clear people in gun-free zones are targetted more often. Either way, property owners have to the right to make whatever rules they want on their own property, that right cannot be denied, even if you think its stupid and dangerous.
It is dangerous and it is stupid. You should be able to carry your gun where ever you go.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore View Post
Yea, it is a very small price to pay. I'm not argueing for people not to have guns, I'm just saying that its better to be discreet about it. Unless you want your house busted into of course.
It is a very small price to pay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildbore View Post
True, but blindly supporting the right to bear arms is just as bad as blindly supporting gun control. Whatever decision one chooses, he or she should be informed.
Not really. Choosing protection is the right choice no matter how you came too it.
Reply With Quote