Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffLV
I take no claim with your belief in choice. I think our right to choose is as vital as our right to be who we are.
I also take no claim, in principle with your second claim. I could care less if it's legally called marriage. My only concern is that establishing a completely new term that is recognised in every state and by the federal government with equal rights is difficult to do and will likely lead to continued discrimination. It's easier just to expand the meaning of marriage in the context of the law.
However, if it could be done with a civil union, I have nothing agianst this idea. Scemantics is a silly issue to me.
|
Marriage is a religious term and ceremony, it is also defined in the Bible as the one man and one woman.
With that said, based on choice gay couples have decided to be together. I see no reason that the government should oppresively tax them, they should be able to inherit and visit when sick and in the hospital. Other than that nothing else should be changed.