Thread: War with Iran
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 02:28 PM
97240sx's Avatar
97240sx 97240sx is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Honolulu
Age: 27
Posts: 366
97240sx has a spectacular aura about97240sx has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 2,951
Default

It's in US "short-term" interests to keep a balance of power in the region--mainly between Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. If any party or country accumulates a significant amount of power over the others, it is in US interests to "rebalance" the region. A balance of power ensures relative stability and a safe, secure, steady supply of oil for all of us. The reason we overthrew Saddam was because he upset the balance of power by: 1. invading Iran in the 70's and 80's; and 2. invading Kuwait in 1990. Saddam had become over-ambitious and threatened to de-stabilize the region.

unbalanced = war; war = expenisve oil

Of course this whole US policy is very short-sighted. The US playing the role of Leviathan can only take us so far and fails to address the actual issues that divide people. We need to start addressing these issues if we hope for any long-term stability and peace.
__________________
"Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I will meet you there."
~ Jelaluddin Rumi, 1207-1273
Reply With Quote