View Single Post
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2008, 09:56 AM
Herkdriver Herkdriver is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 2,441
usa
Herkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant futureHerkdriver has a brilliant future
Credits: 9,681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwerty View Post
As long as we agree that it's not the only source, yes.


In a way, yes. But more pressure has to be put on the parents. Parents have the greatest influence on their kids. Solutions like financial aid and free services for parents could be a way to deal with this. Things like free day care, free sport programs, and free medical insurance for kids in the form of tax write-offs could help parents out tremendously.

Don't have children if you can't afford them.

Why place ALL of the burden on taxpayers.

I'm all for public education by the way, I just think the curriculum its liberally biased.
Reply With Quote