Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P
And I agree with this to an extent. Depending on the conviction.
The reason I say this is a number of repeat offenders go big after their first second and third offense.
I am all about owning. But in my most humble opinion, once you break the law, you forfeit your rights. To which extent is a whole different debate.
AKC. Please elaborate.
|
Excuse me but I don't remember the Second Amendment containing a limitation clause, just a qualification. Did I miss something on the end of "Shall not be infringed"?
Sorry CDP, liberty is an all or nothing game. You either have it or you don't. You want to limit rights based on past wrongs and Sarah Brady just wants limits.
When limits, even ones we like to call "common sense", start getting attached to rights you begin suffering from democracy - or tyranny of the majority as I like to call it