
04-24-2008, 06:08 AM
|
 |
Analyst
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia, Perth
Posts: 2,808
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter
Excuse me but I don't remember the Second Amendment containing a limitation clause, just a qualification. Did I miss something on the end of "Shall not be infringed"?
Sorry CDP, liberty is an all or nothing game. You either have it or you don't. You want to limit rights based on past wrongs and Sarah Brady just wants limits.
When limits, even ones we like to call "common sense", start getting attached to rights you begin suffering from democracy - or tyranny of the majority as I like to call it
|
True restriction has a nature of adding more tape than removing it which leads to tyranny. Its safer to avoid it entirely.
|