Sure it is, if you recognise the large problem that moneyed access causes, regarding enviromental standards and an effective response to climate change. Especially as Obama's main point is hes going to stop this influence over his campaign and his presidency.

Seems a telling point, but I'm aware that one article isn't going to cinch it, and theres a few tricks with numbers that might be being deployed here. Good angle though- not the 'suppposed liberal source must be telling the truth when they agree with me' childish one, but the story itself.