Yeah you are, when you talking with me and you go back into the basic scientific 'refutal' line. At this point we're talking about this list.

So I'm to be impressed by large numbers huh? You're playing right into the hands of a horrible source- there is no back up of these names available, the system has been exploited- just because someone wrote alot of names on an internet page doesn't mean anything.

I'm sure there are people with legit credentials that are on the list(only "1,400 signatories claiming to hold a Ph.D. in a climate-related science" btw, frm the wiki) but like that wiki shows, a random sample of that doesn't even hold up, suggesting you could whittle that down to 200 names.