You want some cheese with that whine? Seriously, you refuse to answer my questions, insist that without any evidence or sources of your own you can cast aside mine and demand I provide more evidence is absurd enough. Then you somehow have mustered the audacity to say things like "I don't deserve to be treated fairly" and that I'm immature in the same post?

The fact of the matter is that you are like all of the blind faithful AGW believers. You want to hold onto your views and attack anyone with ad hominems who disagrees with you, prove they are funded by oil (The truth is I'm raking in millions of dollars to write this post), or do anything but admit that the science doesn't warrant the drastic sorts of actions the enviromentalist crowd insists we make.

Remember the last Great Al Gore Debate? Neither Do I.
(Joke stolen from Climate Skeptic)

True, I had assumed by how long this thread was that the topic had been brought up before. My Bad. However, you guys never just asked that question, you insisted that I hadn't provided readable evidence and was mocking you for not reading anything. If you had just asked "I'm not sure where to look for this cooling period you were talking about, and not sure where I can see what the lines on the graph mean" or something, I would have gladly oblidged. Instead you just complained about my sources, without even going through a smidgen of trouble to analyze them.

If you had looked, it would be clear that the key and an article further explaining the graph were included. You just insisted that nothing usuable was there, you didn't admit that you couldn't find what was there.

I gave you the relevant graph instead of making you look through an article to read up on it. If you wanted to read through the article, the article was linked on the page. Will the complaining ever cease? Of course not, then we would have to talk about the science.

Right now I gotta go, I think I'll try to edit on to this or make a second post later...