Hi there Chief. It heartens me that you took the time for such a lengthy response. However, as I don't subscribe to the school of thought which allowfor people to only address points where they feel they have some advantage, I won't respond to it until you respond to this squarely:
"Lets take a moment to see how far you've come-
Quote:
|
As it explains in the article 15,000 scientists had voted against the kyoto accord. All of those who signed it were basic or applied scientists and it happened all in six weeks. When it comes to scientists signing petitions these kind of numbers are unheard of.
|
[Emphasis added]
I know for so many you don't need to be right, you just need to keep talking. Or maybe you just didn't apply as much thought to it as you now have. Happy to acknowledge you were wrong then than?"
-and the complicity of Lindzen, your reliance apon him and your failure to connect the dots when you said I hadn't refered to any of your names. I'm sure that will be wonderfully humbling for you.
No point arguing with someone who can't admie they're wrong afterall. Has WA ceded to the US btw?