You know what's more interesting?

The vast majority of people who support abortion take that position with the firm conviction that life does not begin at conception. That being said...

If one personally felt "terminating pregnancy is not an easy thing"
but was the right of the individual to make that "decision" Is the life within the mother's womb a human person?

If the answer is no, it is not a human person, why would one feel it "is not an easy thing" to do?

If the answer is yes, it is a human person, why would one advocate "terminating" it?

If the answer is I don't know, if it is, or isn't a human person, how many more "decision(s)" would one make in an uncertain "situation"?

If the unborn is not a human person no justification for abortion is necessary.

However...
If the unborn is a human person, no justification for abortion is adequate.

Nearly all arguments for abortion are based on the faulty premise that the unborn are not fully human.



However, if you were go hunting in the woods, and shoot at someone, not knowing whether or not it was a deer but thought it was a deer and shot them anyway....


You would be charged with murder. Because despite your unceartainty, despite your rights, you have no right to kill another innocent human being. No matter what the hell you think. If you did a lot of thinking you wouldn't be shooting your gun on a "maybe" in the first place.