Originally Posted by raytri

True. So?



First, the cover is illustrating an issue, not promoting a particular doctrine.

Second, are you saying the problem merely is that it involves a doctrine you disapprove of? So it would be okay if it involved something you supported?



So let's fetishize them. Fabulous.

If the photo were disrespectful, you might have a case. But it's akin to using Photoshop to put an object in the Statue of Liberty's hand: a common technique that modifies an iconic photo to illustrate a subject.