View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:39 PM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,964
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 23,442
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
True. So?



First, the cover is illustrating an issue, not promoting a particular doctrine.

Second, are you saying the problem merely is that it involves a doctrine you disapprove of? So it would be okay if it involved something you supported?

No those soldiers sacrificed everything they had and should not be used to promote anything other than the spirit of the American soldier.

So let's fetishize them. Fabulous.

If the photo were disrespectful, you might have a case. But it's akin to using Photoshop to put an object in the Statue of Liberty's hand: a common technique that modifies an iconic photo to illustrate a subject.
The statue of liberty is a really bad choice to back up your argument. Try tomb of the unknown soldier.
__________________
Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies
but not terrorists.
Reply With Quote