Quote:
Originally Posted by Okamifujutsu
That sounds like a recipe for carnage. I could easily see 10 or 20 passengers dying from crossfire. As compared to no one dying if you just ban all weapons. I'd say the math is pretty simple. Even if you disagree, the airline companies know that even one bullet fired on thier plans could cost them millions in bad publicity. It will not happen.
|
What kind of idiotic statement is that? They all died.
All weapons were already banned on this plane and because of it the terrorist were able to take the plane over with a baby and a box cutter.
So your theory is 10 passengers die while killing terrorists is worse publicity than plane hi-jacked, flown into World Trade Center killing 3000 plus the fact that 300 passengers died. I love this forum because it exposes the brain dead.
__________________
ABoyNamedSue - Speaking of Crestwoods posts - And then there'll be some link to some page, written in hindu or something, talking about sherpas and A&W root beer, and how George Bush is to blame for some Jewish neo-nazi death camp, run by Elvis Presley, on the far side of the moon that's been busted for killing kittens or something
|