Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChief
Is Mikhail Danilin a scientist or not?
Oww but it is!
Ok he's valid.
Is he a scientist?
(*)(*)(*)(*) right he ain't
Out of the 6 names you've checked for me 1 was a scientist and 2 were you claimed were but gave no information about the person only the company they worked in. And one you didn't account for. Which makes you wonder were these people fit into the 'worlds top 2000 scientists' well by the IPCC's standard:
Interesting it would seem every tom, dick and harry can be a worlds top scientist by that definition!
Though this list was biased even the whole list can't be compared or used as a number ageeing with AGW because it isn't it's only a number which contributed not agreed. As you so kindly showed for me there are skeptics in the number which puts into serious doubt the idea that humans are very likely (90%) to be responsible for climate change. (I'd also doubt it simple because of the backlash it's recieved. It's like the scientific community almost choked when this went down..)
It is not 'UNNATURALLY' high it is perfectly normal for a warm spell. If anything it's a tad cooler!  |
Can you show me where the quote 'worlds top 2000 scientists' comes from? Is that who the IPCC claims are their contributors?
I've already shown you that the IPCC makes no claim about the contributors being scientists, only that they are "experts in all regions of the world and
all relevant disciplines". So I will agree with you; not all the contributors are scientists.