Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack
If all of our districts were limited to 50,000 that would mean thousands of reps.
In principle I think it would be more represenative to have all those reps...
But on the other hand think of the redistricting expenses, the payroll, and the logistics. It doesn't seem feasible.
|
I argue that increasing our number of Representatives would ultimately reduce the net cost of government; see link below:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack
And seeing how redistricting works in this country, I'd expect to see even more corruption in the end.
|
If you're referring to Gerrymandering, it would be virtually eliminated by 50,000-person districts. There's not too much gerrymandering that can be done when the congressional districts are that small.