View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 11:30 PM
SpankyTheWhale's Avatar
SpankyTheWhale SpankyTheWhale is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: right behind you
Age: 2
Posts: 8,006
SpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond reputeSpankyTheWhale has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 27,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skooter View Post
i agree we need more troops in iraq.
that's one thing i've never understood:
why in 1990, when we were only driving iraq out of kuwait, did we send 500,000 troops,
but to defeat and occupy the entire country in 2003, we only sent 150,000.
always seemed backwards to me.
Yeah, that would be my single biggest complaint concerning the operation of this current war. I would have sent 750,000 and scaled back if necessary as the needs of our troops changed. Surges are only ways to fix mistakes. I support them because I don't want to leave mistakes, but we could have avoided plenty.
__________________
People are called "human beings" when somebody is trying to make a moral or emotional appeal to somebody else. Why are dead people not called "human beens"?
Reply With Quote