View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 11:59 PM
Ozek Ozek is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 349
usa us texas
Ozek will become famous soon enoughOzek will become famous soon enough
Credits: 3,545
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andaras View Post
'Collectivist', 'big government', what else do you mean? Habit I've noticed of posters of the conservative persuasion on this forum is a particular tendency toward branding anyone not totally in lockstep with your own views is instantly a 'communist', 'socialist' or some other overdramatic name.

Somehow because Obama would use government power if he became President, he is instantly a 'collectivist'.

I'd like to tell you something friend, the world in general and politics in particular is a very diverse thing, in Europe for example or even in my own country we do not see government is bad but that it can be useful for solving problems, we don't elect a government with the hope that government will shrink itself into nothing and try to absolve itself of the responsibility of the mandate we gave it but handing everything away to the private sector.

I believe the more power you give the private sector the less democratic the country becomes because the elected government has less economic tools available to implement policies to the people.

Talk to an average person, they don't want their government sold away into nothingness. The anti-government trend in America is truly disturbing because what it will eventually lead to is a completely atomized society where everyone is completely alone and their is no sense of the commons. What you end up with is the 'core' of government, basically emergency services (police, fire, ambulance) and the military, things which if privatized threaten the very soul of what we are as a society or nation, and yet in America even this 'core' is not safe.

You can think as you wish, but I think government is a good thing, and I am proud to say that.

Well in America, we would like our government to be "of the people, by the people, for the people", (Abraham Lincoln) but it isn't.

We would like our government to "derive their just powers from the consent of the governed" (Declaration of Independence), but they don't.

We would like government to be "wise and frugal" (Thomas Jefferson), but it is neither.

We believe that "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests" (Patrick Henry), but government doesn't agree.

We believe that people should "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." (J. F. Kennedy), but instead the government has dished out so much candy lately by mortgaging everyone's future that this principle has been lost.

We also know that "Any man who wants to be president is either an egomaniac or crazy." (Eisenhower), so naturally we are worried about who will be in charge of our government, because it certainly won't be "the people."

We don't hate the idea of government, just how a lot of it is being run. Most Americans, and I think rightly so, see our government as corrupt, inept, disfunctional, and ignorant, with a short-term mindset.
Reply With Quote