Bug.
http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/A...gger_from_data
Quote:
|
Jeff Kuerter, president of the George C. Marshall Institute, said NASA’s mistake cast doubt on all global climate data because the United States was considered the best at taking analyzing temperatures. “If the U.S. doesn’t get this right what might be happening in other places and why did this error persist so long?” he said.
|
I will not engage you further until you can have an adult conversation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MannieD
Question for C-D-P, SpankyTheWhale, Professor Peabody, PatriotNews and anyone else: Do you accept that the global temperature is increasing but deny humans are responsible or do you not even deny that the global temperature is increasing?
|
Mannie.
It is not that the temp is or is not rising. It is how the whole thing is done.
We have not been studying the global climate long enough to say anything.
The models and data are fouled, the percentages of what we actually produce do not meet with the claims. The GW guys do not seem to be looking at alternative causes. There is just too much junk science.
Could GW be happening? Maybe. Could we be the cause? Maybe. But why spend so much money finding out if we are the cause? We all know that pollution is bad (maybe not for the environment, maybe it is. But it is bad for us). Why not divert all this wasted money elsewhere? Hell we may never know what or who is really to blame.
I tried bringing this up earlier in the thread, but was attacked. Can anyone give me an answer in an adult manner? If not then please do us all a favor and hit the back button.
I am tired of talking about who is wrong, and who is right. That is all this forum is. Why not talk about solutions and how to deal with stuff?
This is fricking idiotic.