Quote:
Originally Posted by Foolosophy
I notice you POST the words "Purity of Essence" after each of your comments.
Are the chemicals that the USA has stock piled and wishes to implement in the theatre of war as pure as your "Purity of Essence"?
What if a nation used these so-called NON-LETHAL weapons and chemical weapons against US forces around the world? IS THAT OK WITH YOU?
Or are these purity of essence NON-LETHAL chemical weapons only to used by the MORALLY superior armies of the USA?
What if a neighbouring country of Israel dropped these PURITY OF ESSENCE NON-LETHAL chemical weapons on Israeli Defense force personell?
That would be OK wouldn't it SKOOTER?
Your hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy has no bounds it would seem
|
oh please.
any attack on the US or israel with ANY weapon is not ok.
but if a nation or terrorist attacked us or israel with tear-gas,
i'd be pretty thankful.
unfortunately they like suicide-bombs,
and IEDs.
attacking them with non-lethal weapons would be extending them a courtesy NONE of them would show us in return.
you act like we're evil for advocating the use of 'non-lethal' weaponry.
and yeah, i would call that 'purity of essence'.
being able to extend civility to your enemy that they probably would laugh at us for.
my 'hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy"
is outdone only by your inability to grasp the meaning of your own referenced article.
you do know what 'non-lethal' means, don't you?