View Single Post
  #144 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 02:08 PM
C-D-P C-D-P is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,771
usa
C-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugalugs View Post
N0 - you don't understand the law. You are misunderstanding the language used:

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Get it. The UNSC SHALL DETERMINE - not the USA or George Bush or John Howard or anyone else - the Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace
It seems as if you are the one that does not understand the law. That means that they will determine (they can determine all they want. Nothing in the wording says that they decide for the other nations).

Make recommendations. You keep ignoring that part.

I am still waiting to see where article 39 says. And I quote

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugalugs View Post
Invading a UN member nation without sanction from the UN Security Council is illegal under Article 39 of the UN Charter
Can you please show me where it says that? I thank you in advance.
__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.

Last edited by C-D-P; 05-07-2008 at 02:10 PM.
Reply With Quote