Thread: Kevin Rudd
View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 06:47 PM
Chesby05's Avatar
Chesby05 Chesby05 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,443
australia au west australia
Chesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud ofChesby05 has much to be proud of
Credits: 9,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makedde View Post
Childrens Services take children away all the time, and I imagine some of those children suffer emotionally - should they be compensated?
Yes, actually, depending on the circumstances.

There is a class action in progress in Australia at the moment to compensate children who were placed in foster care and then abused etc.

Righting wrongs has to start somewhere. The `everybody does it' argument kind of just doesn't wash with some things. Neither does the `move on' argument. Nor, for that matter, does the `the end justifies the means' argument. Yes, a small proportion of those children were removed because of the circumstances of their lives. But that was a small percentage, and the predominant reason for the removals - that was written into our legislation - was to `cleanse' the aboriginal race.

Some things need to be apologised for, and need to be made right. That's what makes us human.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makedde View Post
I am so ignorant I didn't even know Canada has Aboriginals.
`Aboriginal' is a generic term for natives. Native Americans are aboriginals. Our indiginous population are aboriginals. The dictionary definition is `describes a person or living thing that has existed in a country or continent since the earliest time known to people'
__________________
We've got rules and maps and guns in our backs, but we still can't just behave ourselves. Even if to save our own lives, we are a brutal kind. The Shins
Reply With Quote