View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 03:19 AM
Ronin-Talgar Ronin-Talgar is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 811
australia
Ronin-Talgar is just really niceRonin-Talgar is just really niceRonin-Talgar is just really niceRonin-Talgar is just really niceRonin-Talgar is just really nice
Credits: 6,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSocialism.com View Post
You misunderstood me, it wasn't that 445 "supposed felons" were scrubbed, it was that my County, Palm Beach County, the third largest county in the state of Florida, did not use the scrub list. Later when they audited the election results, AFTER the votes had ALREADY been counted, they found there were 445 ACTUAL FELONS, (not supposed felons, remember they DIDN'T use the scrub list) votes that had been counted, and YES almost ALL voted for Gore. But their votes DID count in fact count toward the final tally.
Whoa, don't confuse who 'they' are- The county didn't use the list yes, but the Miami Herald did to come up with that conclusion. Like I said, "apparent", as according to the list. I'm not sure where that article is, I found it once- they ran that side of the story one day, and the other side the next. It is the only article mentioned to support this issue, nevermind its messed up numbers (between the two days even, they mixed up the numbers, if memory serves)

Next page of that palast qrticle btw, these are some preliminary numbers. Like I said this is an early report, the numbers would later shoot up-

" An additional 279 were not close matches with names on the county's own voter rolls and were not notified. Of the 3,258 names on the original list, therefore, the county concluded that more than 15 percent were in error. If that ratio held statewide, no fewer than 7,000 voters were incorrectly targeted for removal from voting rosters."

Anyway can we talk about Chaos instead, that was your initial point? Don't you think its immoral and an affront to your Democratic system?
Reply With Quote